Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA. Show all posts

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Modi Haters Will Never Like Him Even If Public Does


Those who continue to question Narendra Modi's leadership, see non-democratic tendencies, see his unrestrained control over the government, party, media, opposition, and call him the most powerful leader after Lord Curzon, perhaps as the king And you have forgotten the expression of people.
Modi's leadership is a reflection of India and its people. Democracy and the constitution are not mechanical. They are defined by the time, the problem, and the resolving leadership.
This is also evidenced by the personality of strong Prime Ministers like Nehru and Indira. It is another matter that at that time a huge personality like Atal Bihari Vajpayee was in opposition which had the power to accept, admire and be proud of his powerful leadership.
Today there is neither opposition nor any opposition leader who has the ability to accept Modi's ability, his personality, his dedication and leadership. Today's opposition is not ready to understand that there is something in the personality and leadership of Modi which the public likes. 
If Modi has changed the political discourse, then Congress leaders and especially Rahul Gandhi have also contributed in this change. He has been trying to prove for a long time that Modi is an incompetent, corrupt and weak leader, but it does not seem to have any effect. Despite this, he is constantly besieging Modi over the dispute with China. They should remember what they got from doing unnecessary attacks on Modi? What Modi initially wore as a gift he received was that Rahul gave the title of suit-boot to the Modi government. 
In response to this Modi made poor policies. After this, he broke that confusion by schemes like Jan Dhan, Ujjwala, Direct Benefit Transfer, Beti Bachao-Beti Padhao, Cleanliness, AYUSH etc.
Mani Shankar Aiyar of the Congress indecently called Modi a Chaiwala, which Modi immediately connected with backward and turned him towards BJP. Modi, who was called anti-Muslim for not doing the iftar party offered by the erstwhile prime ministers, enacted a three-divorce law to improve the lives of Muslim women, which attracted a section of them to the BJP. 
Rahul Gandhi accused the Modi government of being anti-farmer, making Modi the suicides of farmers, but Modi launched a series of schemes aimed at farmers. Thus Modi changed the political discourse of the country under his leadership.
They brought him out of the clutches of the rich, casteism, minority appeasement and scam-corruption etc. to the center of the poor, Dalit-deprived-exploited, minorities, political correctness, development, and inclusive politics. For this, Modi did not adopt populist policies but took drastic decisions in the public interest and country interest. 
In January 2014, the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said in a press conference that Modi being the Prime Minister would be a disaster for the country. The public rejected him and handed him the leadership of the country first in 2014 and then 2019. Not surprisingly, Manmohan Singh regretted in 2018 for calling Modi's leadership a disaster for the country. 
Keep in mind that the people considered Manmohan Singh as the puppet Prime Minister of Sonia Gandhi. He never connected with the public. Modi's leadership aroused hope in the people and increased confidence in his leadership. There is also a fact that no national or regional party has been able to present alternative leadership than Modi. Read More

Monday, June 8, 2020

Digital Tax Is Sovereign India's Self-Right


Digital tax levied on digital businesses could become a new source of income for India in the current tight situation as e-commerce between Covid-19 and the digital economy grow. US multinationals like Amazon, Facebook and Google have complained to the US Trade Representative (USTR) office over the Digital Service Tax (DST).
Subsequently, the USTR office has initiated an inquiry into the justification of the case of imposing two percent DST on e-commerce companies in India. It is noteworthy that the USTR has started a similar investigation against nine other countries besides India. 
The Finance Bill 2020-21 has been enacted into law from April 1, 2020 to impose a two percent digital tax on trade and services done by foreign digital companies with an annual turnover of more than two crore rupees in India. 
In fact, digital tax is levied on income earned in India by foreign e-commerce companies. The scope of this tax includes e-commerce companies from all the countries of the world working in India.
It is noteworthy that at the summit meeting of Finance Ministers of the G-20 countries and the world's top financial policy-makers held in the city of Fukuoka, Japan on June 8 and 9 in the last year 2019, a consensus on the imposition of digital tax on digital global industry-business Was made 
Then, during India's G-20 conference in Osaka, Japan, on 28 and 29 June, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that India's data on data localization and digital tax is an asset that interests developing countries is necessary. The situation is that for the last one year most of the countries of the world have been supporting the imposition of digital tax on enterprises doing digital business, but major digital companies of some developed countries including America are against this new digital tax. 
Estimates of how e-commerce will grow after Covid-19, from a global study report recently released by world-renowned global data agency Statista about the lockdown and change in life after Covid-19 can go. According to this report, 46 percent believe that they will no longer go crowded. In such a situation, a sharp increase in online shopping is set in view of the huge change in the habit and behavior of consumers in the world. 
The situation is that in order to unlock the bright potential of retail trade in India between Covid-19, large online companies across the world, as well as business organizations in India, have started A new strategy is being made to try to connect local grocery shops and traders online. Between the lockdown on April 22, there has been a big deal for Reliance Jio and Facebook to enter e-retail shopping. 
Facebook has announced the purchase of a 9.9 percent stake in Jio Platforms by investing $ 5.7 billion. Now Reliance's Geomart and Facebook's WhatsApp platform will work together to connect around 30 million retail traders and grocery shoppers in India with neighborhood customers.
Due to their transactions being digital, customers from neighborhood shops will get goods soon and the business of small shopkeepers will also increase. WhatsApp has around 400 million users in India, while Jio has 38 crore subscribers. 
Undoubtedly e-commerce has revolutionized the retail business in the country. Due to the number of Internet users in the country at present, more than 62 crore, the pace of e-commerce in the country is increasing rapidly.
The report by Deloy India and Retail Association of India had stated that India's e-commerce market will reach $ 84 billion by 2021, which was just $ 24 billion in 2017. But now it is estimated that Covid-19 is expected to reach $ 200 billion by 2027-28. 
It is important to note that as foreign investment in retail business increased in the country, the pace of e-commerce increased. In such a situation, on the one hand, necessary changes will be made in the e-commerce policy, on the other hand, the digital tax system will have to be vigorously pursued. 
As such, the draft of the new e-commerce policy has been released for brainstorming by different parties. Under the new e-commerce policy in view of Kovid-19, regulatory is also to be ensured for the satisfactory resolution of consumer interests and quality of products in the e-commerce market. 
Appropriate control has to be exercised on such multinational e-commerce companies that have made India the dumping ground for their products. Many big foreign e-commerce companies have been sending their products on a large scale in the country by evading tax. These companies ship these products to India by putting a label of gifts or samples on them. 
The new e-commerce policy will have to make arrangements to curb permissible prices, heavy discounts, and deficit financing so that everyone gets equal opportunity to work. There is no denying that India will present itself firmly before the US Trade Representative Office and the World Trade Organization, and will not come under any pressure. 
After the Covid-19, under the new global economic system, data will be the same importance in the future as gold is today. The move to impose the digital tax is the sovereign right of India and it could become an important foundation for India's economy in the future.

Thursday, May 28, 2020

What If China Ultimately Clashes With India


Chinese President Xi Jinping has pushed ahead with his arrangements to strip Hong Kong of its different status and force the power of the Chinese socialist standard on the previous British region.
Xi's activity features China's central contemptibility and should give all states delay in believing any concurrence with the People's Republic of China given this was not a basic political arrangement but rather a formal Sino-British bargain approved by the two governments in which both consented to permit Hong Kong to oversee itself for a long time, the premise of the alleged, "One China, Two Systems" strategy.
The simplicity of Xi's take-over of Hong Kong and the absence of significant global response may have just sparked the Chinese head's interest. The People's Republic of China has since a long time ago asserted Taiwan as an indispensable piece of one China.
History doesn't concur: Over the most recent four centuries, terrain China just ostensibly governed China during the Qing tradition (1683 to 1895), and still, at the end of the day, its standard just reached out from the hypothetical to the substantial for probably a couple of decades. Any guest to Taiwan today gets that, the Kuomintang trip to Taiwan in any case, Taiwan is socially altogether different from China. Taiwanese want to be the new Tibetans, Uighurs or, presently, Hongkongers.  
As China faces financial vulnerability and a segment cliff, Xi may feel in any case, accepting both the United States to be a paper tiger and an emergency in the Taiwan waterways to be helpful to divert people in general from his own failings. Thus, in remarks on Friday, May 22, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang purposely overlooked "quiet" from the typical detailing about "tranquil reunification."
Be that as it may, while savants and military organizers have for a considerable length of time stressed over a Chinese military push toward Taiwan, the following emergency may not include Chinese animosity over the Taiwan Strait, yet rather toward India.
The Communist Chinese government started a progression of fringe clashes with India after the Indian government allowed the Dalai Lama political refuge in 1959. On October 20, 1962, Chinese powers propelled concurrent assaults along the McMahon Line, an outline among Tibet and India set forward by the British at the 1914 Simla Conference. Chinese powers were generally effective and, in the fallout, the Indian military in a general sense reexamined its stance and procedure.  
China additionally assaulted Ladakh in 1962. While the Western media regularly depicts the Kashmir question as just among India and Pakistan, China controls 17 percent of the domain or a zone about double the size of Massachusetts.
Source Page: http://yourviews.mindstick.com/view/81254/what-if-china-ultimately-clashes-with-india